Chapter 6: Dysplasias

REFERENCES

  1. Little EM. Congenital absence or delayed development of the patella. Lancet 1897;2:781‑784.
  2. Mayer HN. Congenital absence or delayed development of the patella. Lancet 1897;2:1384‑1385.
  3. Wuth EA. Uber angeborenen Mangel Sowie Herfunkt and Zweck der Kniescheibe. Langen ecks Arch Klin Chir 1899;58:900.
  4. Bell J. Congenital absence of both patellae. J Bone Joint Surg 1955;37B:352.
  5. Bernhang AM, Levine SA. Familial absence of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg 1973;55A: 1088‑1090.
  6. Rubin G. Congenital absence of patellae and other patellar anomalies in three members of the same family. JAMA 1915;64:2062.
  7. Most A. Fin fall von congenitalen bildungsanomalilen onychotrophia congenitala. Allg Med Cents Zig 1903;72:153.
  8. Stuart. In: DePalma, ed. Diseases of the Knee. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1954.
  9. Johansson S. Fine bisher nicht beschriebene erkrankung der patella. Hygica 1922;84:161.
  10. Sinding‑Larsen C. A hitherto unknown affection of the patella in children. Acta Radiol 1927;1:1711.
  11. Wiberg G. Roentgenographic and anatomic studies on the femoro‑patellar joint. Acta Orthop Scand 1941;12:319‑410.
  12. Hennsge J. Die arthrosis deformans des patella gleitweges. Zentrabl Chir 1962;32:1381‑1387.
  13. Goodfellow JW, Hungerford DS, Zindel M. Patello‑femoral mechanics and pathology. I. Functional anatomy of the patello‑femoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg 1976;58B:287.
  14. Outerbridge RE. Further studies on the etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg 1964;46B:179‑190.
  15. Hungerford DS, Cockin J. Fate of the retained lower limb joints in WWII amputees. J Bone Joint Surg 1975;57B:111.
  16. Baumgartl F. Das kniegelenk. Berlin: Springer‑Verlag; 1964.
  17. Ficat P. Pathologie femoro‑patellaire. Paris: Masson et Cie; 1970.
  18. Schaer J. Die patella biparitita. Ergeb Chir Orthop 1934;27:1.
  19. Grüber W. Bildungsanomalie mit bildungshemmung begrundete bipartition beider patellae eines jungen subjektes. Wirchows Arch Pathol Anag 1883;94:358.
  20. Stucke K. Die patella partita in ihren beziehungen zum unfall and zer wehrdienst‑beschadignung. Monatsschr. Unfallheilk 1950;53:238.
  21. Blumensaat C. Patella partitia traumatische spaltpatella. Patellarfraktur. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 1932;32:263.
  22. Mori Y, Okumo H, Iketani H, Kuroki Y. Efficacy of lateral retinacular release for painful bipartite patella. Am J Sports Med 1995;23(1):13‑18.
  23. Petty A. In: DePalma, ed. Diseases of the Knee. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1954.
  24. Vallois H. Etude anatomique de l'articulation du genou chez les primates. Thesis; Montpellier; France; 1914.
  25. Vallois H. La valeur morphologique de la rotule chez les mammiferes. Bull Mem Soc Anthrop Paris, 1917; January 18.
  26. Haenisch F. Verdoppelung der patella in sagitaller richtung. Fortschr Roentgenstr 1925;33:678 .
  27. Bennett GE. Operation for hypertrophied patella. J Bone Joint Surg 1922;4:593‑599.
  28. Insall J, Goldberg V, Salvati E. Recurrent dislocation and the high‑riding patella. Clin Orthop 1972;88:67‑69.
  29. Peltesohn S. Das verhalten der kniescheibe bei der little'schen krankheit. Dissertation; Leipzig, Germany; 1901.
  30. Lotman DB. Knee flexion deformity and patella alta in spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1976;3:315‑319.
  31. Micheli LJ, Slater JA, Woods E, Gergino PG. Patella alta and the adolescent growth spurt. Clin Orthop 1986;213:159‑162.
  32. Noyes F, Wojtys E, Marshall M. The early diagnosis and treatment of developmental patella infera syndrome. Clin Orthop 1991;265:241‑252.
  33. Paulos L, Wnorowski D, Greenwald A. Infrapatellar contracture syndrome. Am J Sports Med 1994;22(4):440‑449.
  34. Hallisey M, Doherty N, Bennett W, Fulkerson J. Anatomy of the junction of the vastus lateralis tendon and the patella. J Bone Joint Surg 1987;69A:545.

Figure 6.1. Despite the complete absence of a patella, the trochlear side of the patellofemoral joint looks completely normal. The sulcus shows good depth, and the lateral trochlear facet is more prominent than the medial, which is the normal characteristic.

Figure 6.2. A, Patella parva. The patient is asymptomatic, but the patella is indeed unusually small. B, Axial view shows the patella well within the trochlear borders. The trochlea is nevertheless well developed.

Figure 6.3. A, Wiberg Type I; B, Wiberg Type II; C, Wiberg Type III.

Figure 6.4. Baumgartl type with a medial excrescence (arrow).

Figure 6.5. "So‑called" pebble deformity.

Figure 6.6. Alpine hunter's cap deformity. Here the patella is approaching a single articular facet. There is also considerable decrease in the depth of the trochlear sulcus.

Figure 6.7. Example of a half‑moon‑shaped patella with a bipartite fragment which was removed because patient had severe pain.

Figure 6.8. Variations in patella form considered dysplastic.

Figure 6.9. Further patellar dysplasias.

Figure 6.10. Classic bipartite patellar dysplasia with separation of superolateral corner.

Figure 6.11. Mori has suggested release of the attachments to a bipartite patella fragment. Reprinted with permission from Mori Y, Okumo H, Iketani H, Kuroki Y. Efficacy of lateral retinacular release for painful bipartite patella. Am J Sports Med 1995;23(I1): 13‑18.

Figure 6.12. An example of patellar reduplication.

Figure 6.13. An example of reduplication in the sagittal plane, with patellar subluxation and trochlear dysplasia.

Figure 6.14. A lateral radiograph of the knee of a patient with achondroplasia.

Figure 6.15. Severe patella infera as a complication of tibial tubercle surgery in a youngster.

Figure 6.16. Various trochlear abnormalities.

Figure 6.17. Post‑traumatic trochlear dysplasia may occur after fracture. (Courtesy of David Burstein, Avon, Connecticut).

        

Inside Chapter 6: